jump to navigation

Availability

I am currently fully booked until the end of October 2008.

Please contact me if you have a project which needs to be delivered after then.

Welcome to the Blog

The articles here will help you to manage your IT projects effectively. Please feel free to comment and come back regularly for more.

If you have an RSS reader, there is a feed available here


Can the Team Really Give 110%?

Posted by Cathryn in : Project Management , trackback

One of the major reasons projects fail and teams become frustrated with their project manager is planning for staff to spend 100% (or more!) of their time on the project.

I remember once discussing with the IT Director of a large company why his projects were failing, and suggesting that one reason was because the staff were unable to do the work in the time allocated. Plans were done, estimates of effort were made, the work was allocated nicely so that noone was over allocated, but still deadlines were not met.

It’s very simple.

There are 52 weeks of 5 days in a year. That’s 260 days.

Deduct:
9 days for bank holidays
25 days for annual leave
5 days for sick leave
5 days for training, company seminars and other major meetings

That leaves 216 days, call it 43 weeks. Already, we’re down to 83% of the staff member’s time to spend on the project.

Then comes the tricky bit. How much time do you allocate for work that is necessary but not the tasks that team members are doing? A weekly project meeting, a monthly meeting with their line manager, time spent reading emails, filling in timesheets, answering other peoples questions, quickly helping out on something that’s gone wrong on the project before last. And then there are coffee breaks, smoking breaks, that quick check of the football results and the discussion about last nights episode of Big Brother - not ‘necessary’ perhaps, but very very difficult to ban.

All these extras can easily add up to half a day a week, even if managed well. So, chances are that your team can only realistically give between 70% and 80% of their time to the project.

Finally, if they have any other responsibilities, particularly for support or maintenance of existing systems, that time needs to be formally agreed and included. It is astounding how often people have these responsibilities, often unbeknownst to their line managers or resourcing staff. There may well be a discussion to be had there. The best time to have it is when the person first comes onto the team, when you are planning their time.

It is not unusual to find that a team member is really only available to the project half the time, or less.

When you’re planning, you have three choices about how to deal with this:

  • Ignore it in the hope that it goes away. It won’t.
  • Negotiate away as much of the non-project time as you can. If the assignment is a short one, you may be able to get agreement for no holidays to be taken, and no courses to be attended. That is very dependent on the company. In some places I’ve worked you’ve been lucky if, as the project manager, you’ve even been told ahead of time that someone is planning a holiday.
  • Plan it in sensibly and live with the situation
  • A good project manager will try the to negotiate, and will then plan sensibly with what’s left. As a rule of thumb, I use 75% unless there are unusual circumstances. The most likely reason for changing that is for contractors who have agreed not to take holidays. Even so, I would not go above 85%.

    But, you may argue, my team are dedicated and will give 110%. Good, I would reply. That means you’ve got a way of dealing with the problem if the estimates are bad or something unexpected crops up. If your team are fully resourced on the project from the start, you’ve nowhere to go and your project is very likely to fail.

    Comments»

    1. Leanne - October 12, 2006

    This is incredibly common sense - you’re absolutely right and I’m stunned that it actually has to be said. But most of the time this sort of thing is completely ignored.

    Well done.

    2. James McCurrach - November 20, 2006

    Good stuff, and well said. I often get managers claiming that their people are better and can give more than 100% but as you say, it rarely happens. And of course, the managerial ‘100%’ is 100% of the 75% which you define above.

    It’s true that you can occasionally get over 100% from your people, but only when you remember what a percentage is. A good leader can build up a ‘bank balance’ of goodwill during those occasions when we’re operating below 100%, which can then be drawn on in times of crisis. The poorer leaders either don’t recognise this, or think that you can go ‘overdrawn’ on your bank of goodwill without first building up a credit balance.